Work In Progress
Working Papers
The Double-Edged Sword of Learning by Volunteering: When Corporate Volunteers Broker Knowledge from Nonprofit Partners Abroad.
under review
This paper examines under what conditions anticipated benefits of corporate volunteering with nonprofit partners in developing countries might rather give way to identity strain for participating employees upon their return. Results from a multimethod field study, conducted using qualitative and survey data from a ten-year corporate volunteering program between global logistics provider TNT and the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP), show that such programs can be a double-edged sword, juxtaposing both their potential advantages and drawbacks. Thus, task interdependence with nonprofit peers in developing countries enables corporate volunteers to learn about operating in complex institutional environments and to identify with the partnership, yet also lead them (indirectly) to experience identity strain upon their return – a strain that can eventually induce departure from the firm’s employ. To avoid this risk, firms must foster a sense of the volunteer experience being recognized as valuable. By integrating research on corporate volunteering and cross-sector partnerships, theoretical implications are drawn concerning the micro-level mechanisms through which Corporate Social Responsibility can create private (as well as public) value.
When in Rome: The Tactical Tenor of Environmental NGOs’ Interactions with Foreign Governments (with Mary-Hunter McDonnel and Katarzyna Odziemkowska)
This paper examines the mechanisms by which transnational environmental NGOs learn to strategically adapt their modes of engaging the state to the different institutional contexts in which they operate globally. While transnational NGOs’ strategic formulation is an underexplored concept within social movement theory, we formulate a set of testable hypotheses by drawing inspiration from a related stream of literature within international management that explores how multinational firms overcome the liability of foreignness when expanding globally. We test our hypotheses using a unique longitudinal panel analysis through which we track over twenty years of media-reported interactions between a sample of twenty-four prominent TNGOs and the local governments of 117 distinct countries. We supplement this quantitative approach with qualitative insights derived from survey responses and interviews conducted with fourteen environmentalists within leading transnational NGOs. Our analysis provides valuable insight into the mechanisms by which activist organizations’ tactical flexibility, as a strategic capability, can be developed and honed through experiential learning.
The Determinants of CSR Implementation via NGO Partnerships: Evidence from the 2013 Reform to the India Companies Act  (with Christiane Bode) 
under review
This paper examines under what conditions firms implement their corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities directly on their own or in partnership with nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). We propose that firms’ choices are made in function of capabilities and legitimacy-based considerations, whose effects depend on both corporate and NGO sector characteristics and preferences. We test our hypotheses using government data collected after the passage of the 2013 amendment to the India Companies Act regulating firms’ CSR contributions, covering 80,223 CSR projects implemented subsequently. We find that firms face two sets of trade-offs in making their choice: first, they must decide between investing internally to implement a geographically specialized portfolio of projects versus having to rely on the constraints of the NGO sector’s capacity across geographies and social causes. Secondly, NGOs can help the corporate sector overcome legitimacy deficits but collaboration will not materialize if they perceive the two sectors’ public and private value creation objectives to be misaligned. Our findings contribute to CSR research by explaining how such activities are implemented, as well as furthering our understanding of nonmarket strategy governance more broadly.
Recalibrating the Value of Political and NGO ties: Investor Reactions to Corruption Backlash in Brazil (with Marina Gama and Rodrigo Bandeira-de-Mello)
under review
We study whether and how investors react to institutional backlash against political corruption and, in particular, whether such events lead investors to recalibrate their assessment of firms’ political ties versus their ties to nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). We exploit the police raids in the early phases of Operation Carwash, the largest corruption probe in Brazilian history, to test our hypotheses. Our event study reveals positive market-wide abnormal stock returns following the raids, suggesting that investors reacted favorably to this signal of institutional reform. We then analyzed firm-level abnormal returns for companies not implicated in the corruption probe. The results indicate that investors recalibrated their assessments of political versus NGO ties depending on whether those ties were conspicuous to the public, with asymmetric effects: investors were not swayed by campaign donations that were publicly disclosed but considered the less conspicuous presence of former politicians on corporate boards a hidden liability. Conversely, investors rewarded highly visible ties to NGO partners but not more discrete ties to NGO governing bodies, which failed to provide the same reputational signal. Our results shed light on the impact of institutional events that indirectly affect firms by altering the basis for investor valuations of their entire portfolio of nonmarket ties.

©2020 by Aline Gatignon.